• SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    fedilink
    -107 months ago

    There wouldn’t be barriers to new companies opening up to compete as there are now.

    The current system we use encourages monopolies through the regulations.

    Want proof? Look at the monopolies.

    • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      157 months ago

      There would be the monopolies with private armies and more money than God to shut down new competition. They can lower prices for years to run at a loss locally to run the newcomer out of money, or just do a hostile takeover.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart
        link
        fedilink
        -127 months ago

        Here I am trying to explore an alternative to our current system and you’re losing your mind over it.

        • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          107 months ago

          I’m all for clearing roadblocks for startups and small businesses. Why can’t you do that wile still making sure markets stay markets not monopolys?

            • @NewDark
              link
              117 months ago

              It’s almost like it’s still capitalism dawg.

            • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              107 months ago

              Yeah, so make it easier for competition. And give antitrust actual teeth. There’s massive money flowing into the government and campaigns to turn it into the type of no regulations government you’re proposing. So we need to fight really hard to actually enforce those regulations so monopolys don’t form.

                • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  37 months ago

                  Yes regulations for smaller companies have been added. And big companies love that. Eli Lilly wants as many tests required as possible even though it costs them money, because they’re better able to afford it than their potential competition.