• @DudeDudenson
    link
    36 months ago

    I never knew the wing was actually taller than the roof, I always wonder if someone actually put one of these cars on a wind tunnel to see how effective the extra aero is

    I know the nosecone definitely is a big improvement but I’ve always wondered about the wing

    I guess the sides of the wings would work as lateral stabilizers to help keep the car straight

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        Wow, they all looked pretty stock back then. I just looked it up and they had already been making track enhancements on the cars for a couple of decades by that point, but at least the cars looked like their stock equivalents. It wasn’t until 1990’s that they made the transition to fully dedicated racecars.

      • @DudeDudenson
        link
        16 months ago

        Yeah I know win on Sunday sell on Monday, I wasn’t alive at the time but I’ve seen tons of documentaries and videos

    • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The roof line would have generated a lot of lift, so I suspect the wing helps (be high enough speeds). Aerodynamically it should be pretty efficient since the underside of the wing is unobstructed, but the OG wings were metal, so you were mostly just carrying around a weight penalty on your trunk.

        • @nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The way the top slopes down on fastback cars draws air down with it, and creates a low pressure zone above the trunk, which results in a lifting force over the back wheels.

          Edit: here’s a good 12 minute overview of common care shapes and aerodynamic drag and lift in 12 minutes.

          https://youtu.be/n7EYKVEL7Ds