It’s also regularly confused with a way of saying “I went to a school with ‘progressive’ (read: stupid) ideas about spelling, where the ‘teachers’ would say dumb shit like ‘how would you spell it at home?’”
Fortunately I missed all that nonsense and regularly had classes on the correct use of and distinction between they’re, their and there; two, too and to; bear and bare; should have vs should of; i.e. vs e.g., etc.
Shouldn’t of?
Literacy that matches the opinion
deleted by creator
As if the username and account age didn’t give away your redditorness enough
Removed by mod
That is what the guy would “of” said, yeah.
“Shouldn’t of” is a way of saying “I’m a basic dickhead who doesn’t care for your woke opinions, up to and including grammar”
Huh, TIL
It’s also regularly confused with a way of saying “I went to a school with ‘progressive’ (read: stupid) ideas about spelling, where the ‘teachers’ would say dumb shit like ‘how would you spell it at home?’”
Fortunately I missed all that nonsense and regularly had classes on the correct use of and distinction between they’re, their and there; two, too and to; bear and bare; should have vs should of; i.e. vs e.g., etc.
language changes grandpa, get with the times
Language changes but they should still make sense right? “Shouldn’t of” makes no sense.
Especially when the opportunity for a cool ass double abbreviation is right there. Shouldn’t’ve missed the chance.
KAhfkoa azflyhy kkjsdi osit?
Language changes, granpa. Get with the times.