• @bobbytables@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    238 months ago

    I hate the idea of metric time (for a lot of use cases metric is still awesome).

    12 and 60 can be easily divided by 2, 3, 4, 6. 60 also by 5 and 10. Even for 8 it’s still kind of easy.

    For 10 or 100 division is easy for 2, 5 and 10 and okay-ish for 4.

    The 12/60 (and 360 degrees of a circle) are such an elegant system!

    • @MBM
      link
      English
      88 months ago

      We should “just” switch to base-6 (or maybe 12) first

      • @bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        138 months ago

        AFAIK the system goes back to the old Babylonians who had a base-60 system subdivided into 5 times 12. 5 times 12 could easily be counted using your thumb to count the 12 knuckles on the other fingers and the 5 fingers of the other hand.

        I mean, how amazing is counting like that! I only learned to count to 10 with my fingers. I love the base-10 for its simplicity but base-60, subbase-12 is the shit :D

          • @bobbytables@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            You are right! English is not my first language and I thought I was talking about the pads. My bad! Yours is the best way!

      • @bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        IMHO especially in a setting like time where fractions are very common (like “half an hour”), being able to represent fractions with whole numbers is very convenient.

    • @pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      Thank you ! Last time I tried to explain this on Lemmy, I wrote my longest comment ever. I’m gonna use you much better explanation next time.