Across the United States, hundreds of jails have eliminated in-person family visits over the last decade. Why has this happened? The answer highlights a profound flaw in how decisions too often get made in our legal system: for-profit jail telecom companies realized that they could earn more profit from phone and video calls if jails eliminated free in-person visits for families. So the companies offered sheriffs and county jails across the country a deal: if you eliminate family visits, we’ll give you a cut of the increased profits from the larger number of calls. This led to a wave across the country, as local jails sought to supplement their budgets with hundreds of millions of dollars in cash from some of the poorest families in our society.

  • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    529 months ago

    We claim that our system is intended for rehabilitation.

    News to me, I did not know you guys claimed that.

    • @Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      279 months ago

      The 13th amendment claims otherwise, in fact.

      Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

    • vortic
      link
      fedilink
      129 months ago

      It’s what our politicians claim the system is for. It’s obviously not, but that’s the claim.

      • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        149 months ago

        From an outsider view I did not even know that your politicians claimed that, I thought it was just a few more hopeful ones saying it should be that. I always assumed it was common knowledge that the system in the US was for punishment and whatnot first. Might just be me seeing the movie “Tank!” as a child.

      • @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        Yeah, the US has way to many “bad people” per capita for that to have ever made any sense.