• slazer2au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      Advertisers.

      If you were a bank or a energy company would you want your advert on potentially sexual content, and I use that in looses possible sense.

      It stems for an incident years ago where a “journalist” spam refreshed a ISIS video on YouTube until they saw a VW advert and they ran a massive story about VW financing ISIS via YouTube. I may get getting some details wrong about the story.

    • @A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Tons of kids use their platform, so sexualized content, even lightly sexualized content like this, is sorta questionable.

      Also advertisers.

        • @A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That hasn’t been my experience at all. I feel like you don’t actually use Twitch, but even if you’re right it’s “tu quoque”. Neither party should be showing sexualized content in a space largely occupied by children.

            • @A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              I said spaces largely occupied by children shouldn’t host sexualized content. It’s telling that you have an issue with that.

                • @A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  09 months ago

                  literally antidemocratic

                  Twitch isn’t a state-owned company. 🤷‍♀️ The only vote they care about is the advertiser’s.

                  If you think it’s appropriate to allow sexualized content on a streaming service centered around a hobby dominated by children, make your own.