This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • @qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 months ago

    Oh oops, you haven’t pasted some cool copyleft licence below your words on this niche thread on a niche social media network so looks like I might remix and reuse your content without attribution… Unlucky

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      ZUCKERBERG HAS NO LEGAHL AUTHROITEE YO MY UPLOADS I RETAIN ALL OWNERSHIP FOR EVERYTHING.

    • Draconic NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      I think you got the wrong person, the copyright guy is someone else.

      • @qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve seen a few people doing it, but I (and literally any companies scraping instances for content) just lol and move on.

        • Draconic NEO
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          I feel like I’ve only seen one, maybe two people doing it, but I guess there might’ve been more.