What’s America’s view on this Tucker Carlson?

  • @Urist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No, it is just a plain defect of capitalistic monetization schemes not aligning with what is good for society. Also, for-profit news stink of corruption and bourgeoisie propaganda with added deficiency of boring clickbait tabloid shitreads more adequate as toilet paper.

      • @Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        We are talking about financing. You calling it “state run” only serves to reveal your own bias. It is very much possible to have non profit independent news as well as public funded news outside of politicians control. We have this in Norway, which is really fucking important because one fucking company has bought all for profit news agencies.

        Speaking of glory to the supreme leader, the company in question is also privately held like some sort of Succession fantasy.

        • @Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Yes, Norway, the richest country of the world per capita, a very relatable and reproducible system.

          • @Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Let us not pretend it is that much of an expense to have national public broadcast services. There is also PBS in the US, SVT in Sweden, BBC in the UK and so on. Just admit your point was pointless and the cherry picking was done on your side and move on.

            • @Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -110 months ago

              Yes, I (who didn’t provide examples) was cherry picking. Do you even know what that expression means?

              • @Urist@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                110 months ago

                Are you saying I was wrong for assuming you had examples in mind and that your claim was baseless? Either way, using the term supreme leader ironically is top notch lib edgelord rhetoric in the absence of understanding power dynamics.