MonsterMonster to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoTucker Carlson: Putin takes charge as TV host gives free rein to Kremlinwww.bbc.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square147fedilinkarrow-up1423arrow-down140file-textcross-posted to: news@beehaw.org
arrow-up1383arrow-down1external-linkTucker Carlson: Putin takes charge as TV host gives free rein to Kremlinwww.bbc.co.ukMonsterMonster to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square147fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@beehaw.org
minus-square@Urist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoAre you saying I was wrong for assuming you had examples in mind and that your claim was baseless? Either way, using the term supreme leader ironically is top notch lib edgelord rhetoric in the absence of understanding power dynamics.
minus-square@Urist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-210 months agoWas definitely wrong to think you had some sense
minus-square@Urist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoYou have yet to make an actual argument, which lowers the bar for what I am willing to contribute back.
minus-square@Tja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish-1•10 months agoI made my argument like 7 messages back, you decided to ignore it, because some petrostate has a lot of money, and then hurl insults.
minus-square@Urist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-210 months agoYou just said you did not have any examples to back your claim. Hence it is not an argument, but, as said, a baseless claim.
minus-square@Tja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish0•10 months agoI didn’t say that, but make your strawman.
Are you saying I was wrong for assuming you had examples in mind and that your claim was baseless? Either way, using the term supreme leader ironically is top notch lib edgelord rhetoric in the absence of understanding power dynamics.
Yes, you were wrong.
Was definitely wrong to think you had some sense
Oh, the ad hominems!
You have yet to make an actual argument, which lowers the bar for what I am willing to contribute back.
I made my argument like 7 messages back, you decided to ignore it, because some petrostate has a lot of money, and then hurl insults.
You just said you did not have any examples to back your claim. Hence it is not an argument, but, as said, a baseless claim.
I didn’t say that, but make your strawman.