‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • @AntY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    481 year ago

    The main difference between the two in your analogy, that has great bearing on this particular problem, is that the machine learning model is a product that is to be monetized.

          • @afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I don’t think it is. We have all these non-human stuff we are awarding more rights to than we have. You can’t put a corporation in jail but you can put me in jail. I don’t have freedom from religion but a corporation does.

            • @BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Corporations are not people, and should not be treated as such.

              If a company does something illegal, the penalty should be spread to the board. It’d make them think twice about breaking the law.

              We should not be awarding human rights to non-human, non-sentient creations. LLMs and any kind of Generative AI are not human and should not in any case be treated as such.

    • @S410@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -81 year ago

      Not necessarily. There’s plenty that are open source and available for free to anyone willing to provide their own computational power.
      In cases where you pay for a service, it could be argued that you aren’t paying for the access to the model or its results, but the convenience and computational power necessary to run the model.

      • @MBM
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Sounds like a solution would be to force, for any AI, to either share the source code or proof that it’s not trained on copyrighted data