• Khrux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    I’m don’t totally understand the fediverse and how it works. How does meta making one of their options federated harm the rest of the fediverse?

    • Quokka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      There is zero benefit to engaging with multi-billion dollar companies.

      The harm is they embrace, extend, extinguish the Fediverse and I can easily see the W3C letting them donate and start putting in some features “to protect” the children or media ownership rights or whatever bogus excuse they’ll use to start cracking down on it like every company does every time it gets involved in something.

      • ampersandrew
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        But then if other instances don’t want those features, isn’t the worst that can happen that instances just de-federate from Threads? I know the history of EEE, but I don’t see how that can even work here.

        • @null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          But then if other instances don’t want those features

          In other words, if other instances don’t want to have compatibility with the popular instances – hence the issue.

          • ampersandrew
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That’s not really an issue though; or at least, I’m not yet convinced it’s one. We’re here because we don’t want to have compatibility with Reddit, and I’m on Mastodon because I don’t want to have compatibility with Twitter.

            • @null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              We’re here

              Are we though? Because it looks like you’re on kbin and I’m on slrpnk.

              If either one of our instances decides to implement proprietary features that Threads creates (the second E in EEE) and the other one doesn’t, that could break the experience of us being “here” together.

              • ampersandrew
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                And we’re free to move to another instance that has the access, or lack thereof, that we want.

                  • ampersandrew
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    I always saw that as a feature, not a bug. The feature that prevents it from being the last E.

        • Quokka
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          More companies is the opposite of beneficial for the Internet.

          We need a people oriented Internet.

            • Quokka
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Growth is already steady, and the more these companies shoot themselves in the foot the more large migration waves we get.

              Slightly speeding up an already naturally occurring process doesn’t seem worth the risks of allowing corps into our spaces.

      • Khrux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I should say I’m actively opposed to anyone gaining control of the fediverse but when I started using Lemmy, Masterdon and Peertube, (until about an hour ago) I was unaware that it would be this easy for a big company to just engulf it if they wished to.

        If I knew that the fediverse could be controlled and then drained like every other internet community, I would have approached it differently.