• @moitoi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    Algorithms doesn’t change much. Back in the days when we used mostly forums, and chats, and… all without algorithms, we had the same trend with quality and quantity. The quality went lower with the number of people using them. The small niche forum maintained the quality and for some are still up. The biggest quickly shrink.

    The same applied to the first social media and the newer.

    • Pennomi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      An algorithm that prioritizes quality (instead of engagement) DOES change it though. Let’s not pretend that all algorithms are the same.

      • Lemdee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Let’s not pretend that all algorithms are the same.

        But if we don’t, how can we act superior to people who use algorithm based platforms? /s

      • @moitoi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        You’re pretending what not the same as facts. I can pretend a lot. It’s how I built general statement fitting the majority.

        In fact, it doesn’t work like this. Whatever you use, the quality shrink with the quantity. You will have an equilibrium at some point but even with algorithms targeting quality, it will shrink.

        The algorithms will continually serve something, low are high quality doesn’t matter. If I use an algorithm priorizing high quality content on a poop emoji platform, it will give me poop emoji. What’s matter the most is what is posted. And, you can’t control the quality of the post.

        It’s how mainstream algorithm based social medias actually work. You have farms of content adapting themselves at each algorithm change.

        So, it’s why the quality depends of how difficult it’s to use the social media.