• TwilightVulpine
    link
    fedilink
    121 year ago

    D&D rules have nothing about taking damage through excessive speed either, unless you are talking about fall damage, but that’s not it.

    • @DudeDudenson
      link
      41 year ago

      Sounds to me like you could yeet your party to your destination no problem with it

    • @Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      So, peasant chain up to the closest pit/cliff, yeet enemy at them and watch him disappear on the horizon. Got it. Tie first if flying.

    • gullible
      link
      fedilink
      -41 year ago

      Yes, but accelerating to a specific speed would necessarily involve certain effects, if your DM is halfway fun. The object is dropped harmlessly upon reaching the final peasant but until then, your enemy is on mr bone’s wild ride. If you really want me to offer specific rule-centric (boring) solutions then reverse gravity, 4 100 foot ladders holding queued action peasants, 4x10d6 fall damage to a bound enemy. 8x if you want to occupy all 8 surrounding spots, but we do half-spaces so I don’t know if that would work for other tables.

      • TwilightVulpine
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        C’mon, lets not dictate who’s fun based on a shameless attempt to bend D&D rules and physics into a pretzel. You already gave up on physics at the moment you decided a line of people can pass an object instantly. Going from 100% RAW no physics to 100% physics RAW be damned is kind of a smartass move. I honestly doubt people would even be trying this in real games if not for the meme, because how do you even organize a perfect line of peasants in the middle of a combat encounter?

        There’s a lot of fun things you can do without stretching believability to the breaking point. One of my favorite Pathfinder characters was an aarakocra barbarian that used enhanced carry capacity to wrestle enemies into the air and throw them at each other. No need to selectively reinvent physics to make it work.

        • gullible
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          It’s my gods given right to bend the rules until they tell me otherwise! How Crawford hasn’t errata’d this away with an incredibly simple clarification of “items can’t be transferred between more than 3 people per round of combat” is beyond me. Not to mention the innumerable chances for the DM to say “no” before you gather 6k+ peasants. The line existing presupposes quite a bit.

          • TwilightVulpine
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Oh yeah that is pretty silly. You could make the kingdom’s fastest and most people-demanding mail system, but anything more and your DM is just indulging wacky shenanigans. Preservation of momentum and damage by air friction aren’t in the book so that’s not so much bending RAW as it is quickly switching the PHB for a Physics 101 book and expecting nobody to notice. Bugs Bunny might be impressed but puzzled why you’d bother with those books at that point.