• @deranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 year ago

    Considering aviation is 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, you could get rid of all the aviation emissions and still be very far off from saving anything.

      • @Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Are they obvious? If they account for 2.5%, shouldn’t the focus be on something that doesn’t produce an emotional response (i.e. planes burn so much fuel! They bad for environment!) But is a bigger contributor to polution?

        Ships come to mind. Biggest 5 polute as much as all cars on earth. Yet car electrification is brough on constantly in the discourse, when using bunker fuel on ships is met wirh silence

    • tb_
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Oh no, it’s such a low reduction! Might as well do nothing then.

      • @deranger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I’m not saying “do nothing”. I’m saying efforts are better spent elsewhere as they’ll have much more dramatic effect.

        Air travel should be addressed after massive emitters like industrial sources. Otherwise we’re going to greatly disrupt the lives of normal people trying to see their grandma for very little benefit.