• @deranger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      Considering aviation is 2.5% of global CO2 emissions, you could get rid of all the aviation emissions and still be very far off from saving anything.

        • @Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Are they obvious? If they account for 2.5%, shouldn’t the focus be on something that doesn’t produce an emotional response (i.e. planes burn so much fuel! They bad for environment!) But is a bigger contributor to polution?

          Ships come to mind. Biggest 5 polute as much as all cars on earth. Yet car electrification is brough on constantly in the discourse, when using bunker fuel on ships is met wirh silence

          • @joelthelion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            They are obvious because they are rarely irreplaceable. We can live without mass tourism and fast deliveries.

      • tb_
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Oh no, it’s such a low reduction! Might as well do nothing then.

        • @deranger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          I’m not saying “do nothing”. I’m saying efforts are better spent elsewhere as they’ll have much more dramatic effect.

          Air travel should be addressed after massive emitters like industrial sources. Otherwise we’re going to greatly disrupt the lives of normal people trying to see their grandma for very little benefit.