umami_wasabi to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoGoogle admits Spotify pays no Play Store fees because of a secret deal | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comexternal-linkmessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1861arrow-down110cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1851arrow-down1external-linkGoogle admits Spotify pays no Play Store fees because of a secret deal | TechCrunchtechcrunch.comumami_wasabi to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square135fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnology@lemmy.zip
minus-square@ricecake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish5•10 months agoA company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive. I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.
minus-squareHerbal GamerlinkfedilinkEnglish2•10 months agoit would be different if it was for all it’s competition.
minus-square@ricecake@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoEh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome. This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.
minus-squareHerbal GamerlinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoMicrosoft didn’t make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.
A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.
I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.
it would be different if it was for all it’s competition.
Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.
This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.
Microsoft didn’t make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.