• @nixcamic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2410 months ago

    If you want to start a competitor to Spotify or Google music, you will have to pay those fees making it almost impossible for you to compete.

    • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      A company giving special access to it’s competition on a platform they control is usually used as an indicator of not being anticompetitive.

      I hadn’t considered it from a “collusion” angle.

      • Herbal Gamer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        it would be different if it was for all it’s competition.

        • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Eh, when Microsoft was required to ask you which browser you wanted, they didn’t need to offer every browser, just theirs, firefox and Chrome.

          This could definitely be collusion, but I don’t think that not extending it to all competitiors is what makes it that.

          • Herbal Gamer
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Microsoft didn’t make the other browsers pay for the privilege of being a browser though.