• @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -161 year ago

    Probably shouldn’t rehire someone you probably fired over sexually assaulting his sister…

        • @drdiddlybadger@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          That’s kind of fucked up dang.

          Not just the abuse but the disconnection afterwards is fucked. And when there is smoke like this and that sort of disconnect there is bound to be other shit lurking in the background.

          • @hedgehog@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Ah yes “themarysue.com”, where I get all my news from…

            Part of what makes this particular story noteworthy is the lack of coverage for so long by news outlets, so turning your nose up because of the news outlet that wrote the story kinda misses the point.

            If you’re so critical of The Mary Sue that you’re not even willing to read the article, that sounds like a self-enforced echo chamber. You’re always free to find coverage by another news outlet or even write to a news outlet you respect asking them to cover this story.

      • @Animoscity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        There is none. There are some rumors and past allegations but no evidence or confirmation on why he was removed. Not sure why so many people go around spouting random things as facts.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Not sure why so many people go around spouting random things as facts.

          People love that endorphin rush that comes from being part of a Two Minutes Hate on a “deserving” subject.

        • eric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          We aren’t downvoting you because we assume that didn’t happen. We are downvoting you because there is zero evidence that that is why he was fired.

            • eric
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 year ago

              Ironic that you are accusing us of reading comprehension issues considering your link says the following:

              While we obviously don’t have any insight into the company’s decision, there is a lot of speculation being thrown about online that the move to remove Sam Altman, which came just over a month after Annie Altman’s allegations garnered attention in October, may possibly have less to do with his business abilities snd more to do with personal controversies.

              Your conclusion is based on nothing more than speculation, so you might want to work on your reading comprehension before going around accusing others of the same problem that you clearly are suffering from.

                • eric
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Lol I’m not rescuing anyone, just pointing out the factual innacuracies in what you are saying. I have shown you where your evidence did not say what you were implying, but please, show me where I’m wrong with evidence.

                  ETA: also, you’re wrongly assuming I wouldn’t want him to be fired for sexual assaulting his sister. I do want that, but at the current time, there is nothing other than speculation that would imply that is why he was fired, so I’ve downvoted you for spreading misinformation and for doubling down on your misinformation once that fact has been pointed out to you.

                  • @blindbunny@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -15
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Ahem

                    Probably shouldn’t rehire someone you probably fired over sexually assaulting his sister…”

                    Now go fuck yourself, sex assault sympathizer.

                • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  111 year ago
                  1. You have evidence of your accusation?
                  2. You have evidence that is why he was fired?

                  No, and no.

                  This is why you’re being downvoted, and then you decide to double-down by insulting people. I would say that reflects an ideological perspective.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You’ve been downvoted, but the posts from his sister definitely don’t look great, and I wouldn’t be surprised if that was why the board kicked him out.

    • @VubDapple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      There is a post on lesswrong which compiles the accusations made by the sister. Having worked with many incest victims, family scapegoats and Cinderellas I’ll say the story is familiar to what I’ve heard before and therefore credible.

      • Zima
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Is it usual that all the family and even therapists side against alleged victim? I think it’s not impossible if the person is so traumatized and troubled to the point that the family rejects her but I struggle to believe that is the usual case.

        • @VubDapple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes it is unfortunately common. The family members align in their identification of the scapegoat and their cohesion influences the involved therapists who do not realize the larger picture. The victims are themselves both traumatized and also inculcated family members so it is fairly common that the scapegoats do not realize how fucked up things are until they’re older. Incest families are often highly invested in a family ideal that both hides the ugliness and also enables it to flourish (because our golden boy would never do anything like that!). When the scapegoat finally figures it out and tries to tell the truth they are shut down by the defenders of the family ideal. It is easier to shun the truth teller than to accept that the family system is rotten and work to reform it. Also those who are privileged within the family frequently see nothing to gain by admitting wrongdoing and so don’t. It is as it is with any sort of privilege at the societal level. Those who have it tend not to see it and then resist giving it up even when the weight of evidence that harm is being done is large.

        • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is it usual that all the family and even therapists side against alleged victim?

          On the family conspiring against a single member part, you might want to look up Harrison Post or watch the “Britney vs Spears” documentary (though that’s a bit different and doesn’t have to do with rape, Britney was the rich person and her family conspired against her to take over her wealth, had a psychiatrist, James Spar, fabricate a report against her that subsequently just miraculously disappeared from the court files and even picked a lawyer for her who would side with them).

          Going back to this story, the “shht, let’s not ruin the future of our child prodigy, so even if Sam did something bad to you you will keep your mouth shut” is not that rare among families. Conspiracies by families to cover up rape done by one of them do happen:

          Another very important point that makes Annie Altman’s story highly believable is that since 2020 she’s been resorting to sex work (and also begged on Instagram one day) just to survive, while Sam has a net worth of over half a billion. As I said in another comment, if one of your siblings needs to do sex work to survive while you have hundreds of millions of $s at your disposal, then no matter whether the accusations are true or not, you’re the bad person and there’s something fundamentally evil about you. Going back to the sex work part, here’s what the statistics say (translated from German: https://www.rheinmaasklinikum.de/Inhalt/Patienten/_doc/Evangelische/Hintergrundinformationen_zur_psychischen_Situation_von_maennlichen_und_weiblichen_Prostituierten.pdf ):

          In Hamburg, 98% of sex-workers examined were diagnosed with at least one traumatic event. 83% had already experienced trauma in childhood (family violence 70%, physical abuse 65%, sexual abuse 48%). Trauma experienced during prostitution was found in 83% (physical attack 61%, rape 61%, threat with a weapon 52%). Here, 53% achieved an illness score in the sense of post-traumatic stress disorder. Abuse and dependence on illegal drugs at 74%. Similar alarming findings can be found in international comparative studies.

          And also (https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-017-0491-y ):

          Intimate partner violence was experienced by 21.2% of sex workers, and 23.4% reported client physical or sexual violence. The majority of sex workers (71.2%) reported childhood (i.e., when age <18 years) physical or sexual abuse.

          • Zima
            link
            fedilink
            01 year ago

            I think you clearly can show that it’s possble but that doesn’t mean it’s likely the articles suggest it but they don’t have any statistics to back it up. there is no equivalence between being poor and conspiring to get someone’s money and cutting out someone from their inheritance.

            I completely disgree with your view that if you have money you have to help family even if they are radioactive to you. in some cases it’s best to take distance. especially if the other person is so troubled that whenever you help it just backfires because they can’t stop the drama.

            I don’t doubt that most sex workers have trauma issues or even childhood issues, the part I’m not finding easy to accept is that it’s likely that the family would usually side with the accuser.

    • The Assman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s hilarious that people think this had anything to do with ethics. Money. It’s always about money.