lelgenio@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoRuleeeeeeeglemmy.mlimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1444arrow-down10
arrow-up1444arrow-down1imageRuleeeeeeeglemmy.mllelgenio@lemmy.ml to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-squareMBMlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoBut why. I can’t imagine “technically true but obviously misleading” would be better than straight up lying
minus-squareNelots@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoProbably harder to return when you technically got what you paid for.
minus-squareRunawayFixer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoBasically this, it was after all exactly as described.
But why. I can’t imagine “technically true but obviously misleading” would be better than straight up lying
Probably harder to return when you technically got what you paid for.
Basically this, it was after all exactly as described.