Israeli PM said to have turned down proposal in early talks and continues to take tough line

  • المنطقة عكف عفريتOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I think this is dumb. The title didn’t say all hostages. The article didn’t say all hostages. You invented this in your own head then decided to build an argument around it.

    • @mwguy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -18 months ago

      I mean future articles covering it have said things like “Ceasefire for $x hostages rejected” for exactly this reason.

        • @mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -18 months ago

          “Ceasefire-for-hostages”

          Would you assume that they’re asking for a ceasefire in a percentage of the territory or the full territory?

            • @mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              08 months ago

              That’s not the truth. When you hear the title: “Netanyahu rejected ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza, sources say”

              Do you assume that it’s 40% of the hostages for a ceasefire im 40% of the territory?

              • المنطقة عكف عفريتOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                I think if you want the truth then stop being lazy and read the whole article instead of getting your information from misinterpreting headlines.

                • @mwguy@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I did. That’s why I pointed out the misleading headline as a comment. Had I not read the article I would have assumed that it was a ceasefire in 100% of the territory for 100% of the Hostages that Israel turned down.

                  Just like you would have.