Israeli PM said to have turned down proposal in early talks and continues to take tough line

  • @mwguy@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -11 year ago

    “Ceasefire-for-hostages”

    Would you assume that they’re asking for a ceasefire in a percentage of the territory or the full territory?

    • ???OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • ???OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      I wouldn’t assume anything.

      • @mwguy@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        That’s not the truth. When you hear the title: “Netanyahu rejected ceasefire-for-hostages deal in Gaza, sources say”

        Do you assume that it’s 40% of the hostages for a ceasefire im 40% of the territory?

        • ???OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          I think if you want the truth then stop being lazy and read the whole article instead of getting your information from misinterpreting headlines.

          • @mwguy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I did. That’s why I pointed out the misleading headline as a comment. Had I not read the article I would have assumed that it was a ceasefire in 100% of the territory for 100% of the Hostages that Israel turned down.

            Just like you would have.

            • ???OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              Just like you would have

              Nope. But whatever you need to say to make yourself feel better.

              • @mwguy@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                If you’d have thought a different amount, you’d have said it when i pointed it out.