• @NewDark
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Characterizing Gaza as occupied even after withdrawal, and suggesting that therefore Israel should keep providing them with supply lines even as Hamas attacks and tries to genocide them. (Absurd.)

    It’s blockaded, and you know this. That’s occupied. You’re intentionally muddying the waters. Your categorizing of them being “national belligerents” is both infanitlizing and completely misses why they might be that way. It’s for, like, real reasons, like an unjust occupation and explusion.

    Palestinians within Israel with full rights only exist to provide cover for apartheid.

    The video explicitly talks about the people in Israel proper for the majority of it, the home demolitions and unequal treatment. You’re just wrong here.

    Gaza/West Bank cannot vote in Israeli elections. (They should let the people trying to kill them and outnumber them elect their leaders? K.)

    Sounds like you’re just saying “Great Replacement” demographics shit but with the local Arab population, fearing a demographic majority that might act in the same cruel ways back. A myth by the way.

    Demonstrations in Palestinian territories are illegal. (That’s because they historically kill a lot of people.)

    “The only democracy in the middle east” lmao. Straight fascist apologia.

    Water rights from Oslo agreement. (Well, they agreed to it!)

    How much choice did they have really? And the video even states they get less than the agreement (and it’s contaminated).

    Restrictions on Palestinian movements. Forcible separation via roads, checkpoints, walls… (Palestine is still a belligerent nation)

    I WONDER WHY

    Alright man, it’s clear you either aren’t arguing in good faith, are a paid shill, are a fascist, have brain worms, or some combination of all four. It’s obvious you can’t be helped at this point.