• BerührtGras
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    Maybe make the bank Apps a little more intuitive to use and make it easier to send recurring payments to your friends and the monopoly of paypal in germany could disappear

    • @bob_lemon@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      Yeah. It’s really a UI issue at this point. Just a simple frontend to facilitate SEPA transactions to contacts (which could just be a simple Name -> IBAN map stored locally)

      • @gigachad@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        I could imagine something like an IBAN protocol - open an IBAN link as in iban://AB26374838388 directly with your banking app and auto fill the bank transfer menu. Only add the amount of money you want to transfer.

        No idea what other implications that would have e.g. for security though

        • rentar42
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          Oh, add an ?amount=32€ as well as a text=Pizza parameter and you’re almost there …

            • rentar42
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              I thought about that, but I think it’s actually more error prone, because people might just be setting ?amount=32 and leaving out currency which might lead to unexpected behaviour. Implementors tend to interpret this differently and one app might take the default currency and the other might fail to accept it, and that kind of different behaviour is a common source of security issues. Having a single unified parameter that must always contain the value and currency “solves” that issue.

              • @LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                Makes it a bit more annoying to parse, though I definitely see your point.

                However, you’re still proposing a standard: “has to include both the currency and the amount in the parameter”, so why not split them up at that point?

          • @sergih@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Idont’t think that’s a good idea, too many peoplr quickly pressing pay and then they tealizef only afyer paying thay there’s an extra 0

            • rentar42
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              There’s still plenty of steps that your bank app can (and will) take to verify this is as intended. Requiring the user to “parse” the URI is not scalable anyway, the app needs to present the information clearly (i.e. "Do you really want to transfer 123.45€ to IBAN abcd, you have not transferred money to this IBAN before, the IBAN indicates a bank in " where the money amount is clearly highlighted).

              • @sergih@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I agree, still having to input the money manually is the best failsafe, how many people are used to just automatically hitting whatever button to make a message go away for example (even more with the cookies), best failsafe is inputting the money manually, you’d never mistakenly/automatically do that.

          • @gigachad@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            True, my bank also supports this. I already saw QR-Codes on some invoices but never used it… will try it out next time.

        • @azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Main problem I see is that as it stands it’s insanely easy to forge a SEPA mandate. Ever had to fill one out? It’s literally just a piece of paper saying “I, John Doe, allow XXX to take money for services rendered from my acount AB1234. [signature]”. The wonder of legacy processes built for companies with fax-based workflows…

          I believe only some “trusted” commercial customers are authorized to turn in SEPA mandates (I know my ISP went into some bankruptcy proceedings and lost their ability to use their SEPA mandates for instance), but still, that makes me somewhat wary about who I give my IBAN to. I’d certainly not put it up online for anyone to see.

          • @LufyCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            Didn’t know it was this simple, that’s stupid.

            I believe though that in today’s day and and of banking apps this should be very easily solvable with inapp confirmations

            Let’s hope the old way dies

      • @JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Alternatively, let’s kill contact lists completely and do this some other way. Contact lists are already a privacy disaster, allowing users to compromise all their friends’ personal information without a hint of consent.

          • @JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Speak for yourself. Speaking for myself, I don’t even use my contacts app for this reason. When the “current best solution” involves telling Big Tech the identity particulars of all your friends, it is not a solution to anything. If this had not been normalized by Google and Apple 15 years ago, it would surely be illegal.

            • @LufyCZ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Jesus Christ then don’t use it if you mind, but overall, it’s the best solution for keeping track of people’s phone numbers.

              You’re saying kill it but not offering a better choice, you’ll never accomplish anything like this.

              • @JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                Well pardon me but “Jesus Christ” perhaps some of your friends never asked you to share their names and phone numbers with Google or anyone else just because it makes life convenient for you.

      • @cestvrai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Maybe I’m missing something here, don’t we already have this UI from our banking apps?

    • Fushuan [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      You should push for something like BIZUM. Say what you will about Spain but we got that right.

    • tetris11
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      I just want an easier way to give money to homeless people, without them having to depend on an electricity supply.

        • tetris11
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          There are penalties for carrying cash. One is the time burden of withdrawing it, the other is that if your bank has fees for more than X withdrawals a month then you will be deincentivized.

          • BerührtGras
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            how much money do you want to give to a homeless person for you needing to withdraw a high amount of cash each month?

            • @mayonaise_met@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I just don’t want to have cash on me. My wallet is already quite a stack of cards. Two debit cards, a credit card, two vehicle registration cards, a roadside assistance membership card, a driver’s license.