• @ridethisbike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    Oddly enough I think he meant that having your own car is more efficient than mass transit for the individual. And really, we’re talking about time spent traveling more so than overall energy spent.

    It takes me less time to get in my car and drive downtown than it does to wait on a bus to arrive and eventually get me to where I’m going… Which is why cars are never going away.

    You guys are both talking about different types of efficiencies.

    That said, yours is the type of efficiency that MOST people are talking about when this discussion is had.

    • @RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I don’t even think it’s efficient in that way either though.

      I mean, sure, you can get in your car and start driving faster. But then you likely have to sit and wait at traffic lights, sit in traffic if you’re anywhere in a city, and find parking.

      That just seems less efficient than getting to the nearest bus stop or train station and not having to deal with any of the trouble of driving. Of course, as long as the city is designed well, which you can’t find in the US.

      • @Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        This is so dependent on the area though.

        Yes deep in cities you may be sitting forever, but inter city and rural travel is basically non stop 60-70 mile per hour travel.