@Oiconomia@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year agoIt can be shown that...feddit.deimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down19
arrow-up1234arrow-down1imageIt can be shown that...feddit.de@Oiconomia@feddit.de to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarekrellorlinkfedilink17•1 year agoProof by intimidation: is left as an exercise for the reader. can be trivially shown. as shown in many introductory texts.
minus-square@TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish9•1 year ago As explained in my prior work (prior work gives no explanation)
minus-square@gaston1592@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 year agoproof by recess: As we will prove after the break. Riing Before the break we proved that…
minus-square@DrQuint@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoI saw this in a HCI paper once. The prior work was just a review of current science, and had no findings in regards to the topic stated. I did not point it out to the guy. We all knew 80% of what’s written in the field was bullshit.
minus-square@MBMlinkEnglish2•1 year agoAs shown in the full version (the full version never got made)
Proof by intimidation:
is left as an exercise for the reader.
can be trivially shown.
as shown in many introductory texts.
(prior work gives no explanation)
proof by recess:
I saw this in a HCI paper once. The prior work was just a review of current science, and had no findings in regards to the topic stated.
I did not point it out to the guy. We all knew 80% of what’s written in the field was bullshit.
As shown in the full version (the full version never got made)