• Andreas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    Is this like when they made the kilogram some function of the speed of light instead of the weight of a metal ball in a French museum?

    • @BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I misread that as “meat ball”, and now I’m kind of disappointed that we don’t use meatballs as a standard unit. “I’m 6 meatball subs and 3 balls high”, “The yacht is about 18 giant party subs long”, etc.

      • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Unfortunately this is a bit like the imperial system where you get multiple units of measurement. There is the standard foot-long, which is twelve inches, and there is the $5 foot-long™, which is only 11 inches

    • @Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not exactly. The kilogram was redefined in a fundamentally different way, moving from an artifact, which will change with time, to a fundamental property of nature, that as far as anyone knows, will be the same at all times. The second was already defined in such a way. Any such definition still requires some sort of measurement though to get something usable. Different ways of measuring the same type of definition can be more precise, and in this redefinition they think they’ve found a more precise method that works in the same fundamental manner. Both measure the oscillation rate of atoms, but the proposed element is thought to give better precision.