@small44@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agoScientists are hoping to redefine the second – here's whytheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1253arrow-down113
arrow-up1240arrow-down1external-linkScientists are hoping to redefine the second – here's whytheconversation.com@small44@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 9 months agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-square@kogs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish14•9 months agoYou can now be more accurately late for work. Or your coffee is more accurately taking a long time to come out.
minus-square@scratchee@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish10•edit-29 months agoIf they can predict earthquakes and eruptions more accurately, as suggested in the article, then yes for all the people who don’t die.
minus-square@lightnsfw@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish5•9 months agoI better not have to buy a new watch because of this.
Would this affect our lives on Earth?
You can now be more accurately late for work. Or your coffee is more accurately taking a long time to come out.
Relativistically.
If they can predict earthquakes and eruptions more accurately, as suggested in the article, then yes for all the people who don’t die.
I better not have to buy a new watch because of this.