• @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 months ago

      It’s probably because they know they won’t be temporary refugees. If they leave Gaza they will never be allowed to return. It’s ethnic cleansing.

      • Bernie Ecclestoned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        Pretty sure the 50% of the Gaza population who are children would be better off not being bombed to fuck. That’s ethnic cleansing. Moving down the road a bit while Hamas gets wiped out seems a wise move.

        • @jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          What really grinds my gears, are people who purposefully immigrated to both Gaza, and as Israeli settlers, just to have as many kids as possible to increase the population, then use their own kids as throwaway tokens in a fully expected conflict.

          Having double nationality and now asking “their countries” to avacuate them, is just extra insulting.

        • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          True that’s also ethnic cleansing. Hm. Maybe some country shouldn’t be engaged in ethnic cleansing. Maybe that’s the actual problem.

          • Bernie Ecclestoned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            69 months ago

            Yes, Hamas’ entire existence is built on their charter to ethnically cleanse the Israelis…

              • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                We’ve just witnessed what happens when Hamas puts all of their might into their charter of ethnic cleansing. If Israel had such a charter, what would it look like if Israel put all their might into ethnically cleansing Gaza?

    • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      Palestinian militants have a history of establishing enclaves and starting civil wars within the countries that host them. Arab countries have an apprehension about allowing too many Palestinians in because of this history.

      • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        This was a sad thing to learn about. Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait. All of them saw civil war or strife after taking in Palestinians :/.

      • @charliespider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Palestinian Iranian backed militants have a history of establishing enclaves and starting civil wars within the countries that host them. because of this history.

        FTFY

        • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Yes, Iranian regimes have provided material aid to Palestinian militants towards their goals. That aid is still being provided, hence continuing apprehension.

      • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        09 months ago

        Would it work for a larger country to fly in refugees, since hopefully they’d be much more resistant to civil wars? It’d be hard to sell your citizens on spending that much on non-citizens though.

          • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            29 months ago

            They don’t all need to go one place, but I agree it’s unlikely to happen.

            This is potentially larger than the rwandan genocide if you count all 2M inhabitants. We can’t just let all these people die.

            • @VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              Right? We could split them up more, basically make the entire population a refugee diaspora split among various Arab countries, but then that means the Jewish people just did to another people what they claim was bad for them. Plus, isn’t forcing migration is basically genocide? We can’t condemn Stalin for doing the same thing a country we support is doing.

              • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                09 months ago

                Yeah, that’d be pretty terrible. But letting them be killed would be a lot worse. If there aren’t enough supplies able to get in, and countries don’t want to force Israel, it might be the lesser of two evils.

        • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That is a better solution for those who want to flee or have the means or freedom to flee, or are ok with abandoning their communities and historical ties. However this would only help those refugees. For those who remain the situation will remain untenable until militants stop rising to power within Palestinian territories, and Israel negotiates a two state solution that involves giving up some land.