• @protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    671 year ago

    “If Hamas doesn’t return our hostages, we will kill every man, woman, and child in Gaza.”

      • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        It’s probably because they know they won’t be temporary refugees. If they leave Gaza they will never be allowed to return. It’s ethnic cleansing.

        • Bernie Ecclestoned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Pretty sure the 50% of the Gaza population who are children would be better off not being bombed to fuck. That’s ethnic cleansing. Moving down the road a bit while Hamas gets wiped out seems a wise move.

          • @jarfil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            7
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What really grinds my gears, are people who purposefully immigrated to both Gaza, and as Israeli settlers, just to have as many kids as possible to increase the population, then use their own kids as throwaway tokens in a fully expected conflict.

            Having double nationality and now asking “their countries” to avacuate them, is just extra insulting.

          • @Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            True that’s also ethnic cleansing. Hm. Maybe some country shouldn’t be engaged in ethnic cleansing. Maybe that’s the actual problem.

            • Bernie Ecclestoned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              61 year ago

              Yes, Hamas’ entire existence is built on their charter to ethnically cleanse the Israelis…

      • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Palestinian militants have a history of establishing enclaves and starting civil wars within the countries that host them. Arab countries have an apprehension about allowing too many Palestinians in because of this history.

        • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          This was a sad thing to learn about. Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan, Kuwait. All of them saw civil war or strife after taking in Palestinians :/.

        • @charliespider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Palestinian Iranian backed militants have a history of establishing enclaves and starting civil wars within the countries that host them. because of this history.

          FTFY

          • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Yes, Iranian regimes have provided material aid to Palestinian militants towards their goals. That aid is still being provided, hence continuing apprehension.

        • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          01 year ago

          Would it work for a larger country to fly in refugees, since hopefully they’d be much more resistant to civil wars? It’d be hard to sell your citizens on spending that much on non-citizens though.

            • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              They don’t all need to go one place, but I agree it’s unlikely to happen.

              This is potentially larger than the rwandan genocide if you count all 2M inhabitants. We can’t just let all these people die.

              • @VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Right? We could split them up more, basically make the entire population a refugee diaspora split among various Arab countries, but then that means the Jewish people just did to another people what they claim was bad for them. Plus, isn’t forcing migration is basically genocide? We can’t condemn Stalin for doing the same thing a country we support is doing.

                • @JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Yeah, that’d be pretty terrible. But letting them be killed would be a lot worse. If there aren’t enough supplies able to get in, and countries don’t want to force Israel, it might be the lesser of two evils.

          • @MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            That is a better solution for those who want to flee or have the means or freedom to flee, or are ok with abandoning their communities and historical ties. However this would only help those refugees. For those who remain the situation will remain untenable until militants stop rising to power within Palestinian territories, and Israel negotiates a two state solution that involves giving up some land.

      • @protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        How would they turn on Hamas? What would that even look like? I’ve heard tons of interviews with Palestinians, and almost all were just as shocked at what happened as Israelis. Many, many already do not support Hamas, but what is there to even do about that when you’re just trying to find enough food and water to keep your family alive?

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        That strategy has been tried a million times and it has never worked. Remember when Cubans ousted Castro? Me neither.

    • @sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      The Gaza strip has been systematically economically destroyed for over 20 years. The border with Israel has been strictly controlled since Hamas came to power in 2007. Israel does not allow goods to cross the Gaza-Egypt border directly, everything must go through Israel. There are only 2 border crossings, and all import and export is strictly controlled. Import of any goods marked “dual-use” (possibly useful for both military and civilian) is limited. About 80% of business in the Gaza strip has closed doors since the blockade began. Even “internal” trade is hampered by the blockade. Palestinian fishermen in Gaza, who want to sell their fish to Palestinians in the west bank, are restricted by a fish export quotum imposed by Israel. This quotum was halved by Israel last year, cutting income of the fishermen in half.

      Infrastructure is periodically destroyed. In accordance with peace accords from the nineties, a seaport was being constructed in Gaza with European funding. However, in 2001 Israeli tanks destroyed the construction site, and bombed the site again several months later. European companies then pulled out of the project. Since 2007 Israel blockades the Gaza strip fully by sea also. A similar fate befell the Palestinian airport: the radar station and control tower were bombed, and bulldozers have cut the runways, rendering it inoperable.

      Furthermore, Israel collects tax on behalf of the Palestinian state. These taxes form about 60-70% of Palestine’s income. Israel regularly suspends payments as “punishment” for terrorist attacks. It also keeps part of the taxes collected for itself before transferring the remainder to Palestine. The amount withheld was doubled last year by the Israeli minister of finances.

      Another important source of income for Palestinians is labor in Israel. Palestinians are used as a source of cheap labour by Israel in the construction, industrial, and agricultural sectors. When the current war broke out, most of the workers were arrested and deported to the West Bank, even though they actually live in the Gaza strip. Some are stuck there while their families in Gaza die in the retaliatory bombardments.

      • @Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Geno in genocide isn’t referring to genetics. It’s gene as in genos as in race not religion. Arab Jews and Arab Muslims are the same race so it couldn’t be genocide strictly defined but rather the UN/international definition. And that’s wholely ignoring that race is a social construct not a objective fact and science does not in fact recognize “race” but rather geographic phenotypical derivation.

        These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Victims are targeted because of their real or perceived membership of a group, not randomly.[1][2]

  • @okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    Given that they are committing a war crime against 2 million people, which by some definition can be considered hostages… This is quite rich.

  • MrScottyTay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Aren’t they going to essentially kill the hostages if they keep up with the seige and bombings?

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    English
    81 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    JERUSALEM/GAZA/ASHKELON, Oct 12 (Reuters) - Israel said on Thursday there would be no humanitarian break to its siege of the Gaza Strip until all its hostages were freed, after the Red Cross pleaded for fuel to be allowed in to prevent overwhelmed hospitals from “turning into morgues”.

    Israel has vowed to annihilate the Hamas movement that rules the Gaza Strip in retribution for the deadliest attack on Jews since the Holocaust, when hundreds of gunmen poured across the barrier fence and rampaged through Israeli towns on Saturday.

    Israel has responded so far by putting the enclave, home to 2.3 million people, under total siege and launching by far the most powerful bombing campaign in the 75-year history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, destroying whole neighbourhoods.

    “The human misery caused by this escalation is abhorrent, and I implore the sides to reduce the suffering of civilians,” Fabrizio Carboni, regional director of the International Committee of the Red Cross, said in a statement on Thursday.

    No electrical switch will be lifted, no water hydrant will be opened and no fuel truck will enter until the Israeli hostages are returned home.

    He will also visit Jordan, and officials in the Palestinian Authority - rivals to the Hamas Islamists that control Gaza - said Blinken would meet their president, Mahmoud Abbas, on Friday.


    The original article contains 822 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • @jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      The war has torn up diplomacy in the region, just as Israel was preparing to reach an agreement to normalise ties with Saudi Arabia, the richest Arab power, and months after Riyadh resumed ties with its regional rival Iran, sponsor of Hamas.

      The Israel Saudi Arabia agreement probably is one of the major instigating factors of the current events. The new hostilities will push Israel and Saudi Arabia part, ensuring that Iran doesn’t have to contend with an alliance.

  • Chariotwheel
    link
    fedilink
    11 year ago

    What a time to be alive to see millions of people getting starved to death live while world leaders applaud and call it defense.

    • DarkGamer
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Egypt is letting in supplies but they refuse to let Palestineans leave through Egypt.

      One of the Egyptian security sources, who asked not to be identified, told Reuters news agency that Egypt rejected the idea of safe corridors for civilians to protect “the right of Palestinians to hold on to their cause and their land”.

      Evidently they care more about the political pressure Palestineans provide against Israel than they do keeping their fellow Arabs safe, and they don’t want to deal with the negative effects of letting hostile refugees in. (That didn’t work out well for Jordan or Lebanon.)

    • probablyaCat
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Honestly this is an awful situation. But the reason you don’t see more harsh criticisms from world leaders (and there have been criticisms and statements calling some of what they are doing as illegal) is because the world leaders know that they may need to same option if something similar happens to them.

      Do you have a better suggestion for what Israel should do in order to respond. And saying “free Palestine” doesn’t count. They completely left Gaza and it got worse. I can’t stand Bibi, but he absolutely called it when they were planning to leave Gaza. The blockade of Gaza didn’t start until Hamas took over. And do recall Egypt is also blockading.

      If Tijuana started launching rockets and attacked thousands of civilians in California, what do think the response would look like? Or if Morocco did the same to Ceuta?

      I don’t see how this attack ends. I mean it has absolutely destroyed the chance for Gaza reps to be involved in peace talks. Not that there was much chance of that. Honestly, if I had to guess, Israel plans to wipe out all of the higher up Hamas this time in an attempt to bring Gaza back under the PA/Fatah.

      But, given the situation is what it is, how do you think the Israeli government should respond?

      • Silverseren
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        “They completely left Gaza and it got worse.”

        They left Gaza and then doubled down not only on embargoes, but also on building illegal settlements in West Bank in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention that they are signatories to.