• @Username@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    The problem is that even in low traffic, there is a truck on the right lane every few meters. Often, after you switch to the right lane, someone decides to drive right next to you, forcing you to brake.
    It’s just more comfortable to stay in the middle lane.

    Now IMHO the real problem is when trucks are overtaking with 101km/h…

    • @SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      261 year ago

      It’s just more comfortable to stay in the middle lane.

      It’s stil a dick move if the rightmost lane is free. Then you’re effectively overtaking a phantom car at the exact same velocity (as nobody is allowed to pass right).

      • @Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I agree but need to have “free” defined. If there’s another truck 100/200m ahead then it’s a pain in the ass because like the other said, others behind you won’t do the same and will do a slight acceleration when you go in the right lane (because free space in front = accelerate hurr durr), preventing you from changing lanes again when you get to the next truck and so you have to brake and hope you get a gap again soon to overtake the truck.

        If it’s literally empty as far as the eye can see then yeah, move over!

      • @saltesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s like when a lane closes and people that merge in near the end get blocked for “trying to get ahead”. But the road is closed there, not a kilometre before. They closed it there to maximise multiple lanes as long as possible to limit the bottleneck caused by the lane closure—use it so everyone can get through quicker. It must be painful to see for the people that set it up. Whatever the situation, traffic go faster when maximising available space and lanes.

      • @Username@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        The rightmost lane is never completely free. And if it is, almost all drivers do use it.

        What makes your right to go fast on the left lane more important than their right to go a reasonable ~120km/h in the middle lane?

        • What makes your right to go fast on the left lane more important than their right to go a reasonable ~120km/h in the middle lane?

          Nothing, but that wasn’t the created scenario. If the right lane isn’t free, do stick in the middle lane of course (squishing two vehicles together isn’t gonna make them go faster, usually). The scenario created was talking of an empty right lane, which should only exist on the left side, as we should drive on the right side of the road.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      10 seconds. If you’re not overtaking anything within 10 seconds, you should pull into the inside lane.

      This is what I was taught in advanced driver training. However, in practice I use 7 seconds, because I find 10 seconds a little too far to easily estimate by eye. I end up thinking “is that 10 seconds? I’m not sure, maybe” then by the time I figure out it was more than 10 seconds it is now less than 7.

    • @SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      trucks are overtaking with 101km/h

      As trucks are governed to a Vmax of 90 kph, and some even to 85 kph, I would suggest you get your speedometer checked, because it sounds like the advancement, required by law, is too high. It shouldn’t show more than 7% more than your actual speed. Truck speedos are more rigorously controlled and show an average of 2 kph too much at 80 kph, so trucks overtaking at 101 kph is not normally possible - of course, speedo manipulation does occur, but it isn’t so rampant that they all overtake at 101 kph.

      • @Username@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Okay, I never looked at a truck’s speedometer. The point is they are overtaking just slightly faster.

        It certainly feels like most trucks are going at least 90 km/h regularly.

        • @SirQuackTheDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          The point is they are overtaking just slightly faster.

          Trucks also spent long stretches in the same order, sometimes they change things up.

          The speeds of trucks are measured on-board by a tachograph, so any big deviation can give them a fine, even if they weren’t caught on the spot.

          And that 20 second delay really isn’t gonna impact the trip as a whole. Just rolling with it will make your trip less stressful, and therefore more enjoyable. If you’re late, rushing through traffic isn’t gonna make a significant impact, except on your risk of accidents.

          • @Username@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            And that 20 second delay really isn’t gonna impact the trip as a whole.

            That is true. Therefore there shouldn’t be a problem with drivers driving a steady speed in the middle lane.

    • @mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Truck driver have timelines. It is totally okay, if they need to occupy the middle lane. Sometimes even the left lane. It is more rare then middle lane sitters.

      But what is not okay is that the cultural habit of “don’t clog” has forgotten. People are ignorant shits these days when entering cars.

      If you decide to travel via 100 kph and do not want to flow with the traffic, then just stick to the right lane and flow with the trucks?! This way you have the most fuel savings as well.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It is totally okay, if they need to occupy the middle lane.

        Truck drivers are running a commercial operation, I shouldn’t have to be inconvenienced so they can more easily make money - especially not when that inconvenience is caused by them not following the rules of the road.

        Sometimes even the left lane.

        This may be illegal, depending on jurisdiction and circumstances.

        • @mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Truck drivers are running a commercial operation, I shouldn’t have to be inconvenienced so they can more easily make money - especially not when that inconvenience is caused by them not following the rules of the road.

          It is about the person sitting inside the ferry. Once you work together with drivers you will change your attitude torwards them immediately. They working conditions are very difficult. Especially when they are crossing jurisdications/states.

          When I am driving I have no problems eith truck drivers. They even help going onto the highway or mention radars.

          The people sitting in the middle are the problem. Most of them doesn’t even accelerate passing another middle-lane-sitter.

          Im driving for two decades. I did multiple years of disposition. I’m telling you: Middle sitters are the problem and responsible for most crashes on the autobahn.

          • TWeaK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -21 year ago

            It is about the person sitting inside the ferry. Once you work together with drivers you will change your attitude torwards them immediately. They working conditions are very difficult. Especially when they are crossing jurisdications/states.

            This is the classic “feel sorry for the waiter working on sub-minimum wage, he’s supposed to be subsidised by tips!” bullshit argument. Yes, truck drivers are a victim of the businesses they work for and aren’t paid well enough. That doesn’t mean that they, as representatives of the business they work for, should get away with doing things that are wrong and inconvenience everyone else. Particularly when it is the business that sets the conditions that push drivers to behave as they do.

            The truck driver might not be making much of a profit, for the long hours they work. But the truck is there to make a profit. The majority of everyone else on the road is not driving for work. People driving for work should not inhibit everyone else, who are inherently paying a loss to drive somewhere.

            In fact, drivers in general shouldn’t inhibit others. Driving in the outside lane when you’re not overtaking is a shitty move, regardless.

            Pay attention, plan well ahead to pull out when you need, accelerate as needed so you don’t hold up anyone when you pull out.

            If you’re not willing or able to accelerate, then you shouldn’t pull out. By all means indicate your intention (and do so well in advance), but don’t move over until the lane is clear.

            When I am driving I have no problems eith truck drivers. They even help going onto the highway or mention radars.

            The people sitting in the middle are the problem.

            Yeah, but we’re talking about truck drivers who sit in the middle lane.

            It sounds like you’re from somewhere where this isn’t much of a problem. The professional drivers are professional. That’s awesome, but know that it doesn’t hold true everywhere, either across the US or in Europe or elsewhere. It’s not even a national thing, driving habits vary by region.

            But yeah, people sitting in the middle is a problem. The bigger problem is that it’s so poorly defined - I was taught “if you’re not overtaking within 10 seconds, you should pull over”. 10 seconds is very conservative, I work to 7 seconds.