We are contacting you regarding a past Prime Video purchase(s). The below content is no longer playable on Prime Video.

In an effort to compensate you for the inconvenience, we have applied a £5.99 Amazon Gift Card to your account. The Gift Card amount is equal to the amount you paid for the Prime Video purchase(s). To apologize for the inconvenience, we’ve also added an Amazon Gift Certificate of £5 to your account. Your Gift Card balance will be automatically applied to your next eligible order. You can view your balance and usage history in Your Account here:

  • eric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1771 year ago

    And it may be illegal in some states to not offer the customer an actual refund.

      • @odium@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I know they probably actually meant the States of the US, but…

        They did say states with a lowercase s. ‘States’ = regions within a country, ‘states’ = can mean countries. Technically they aren’t defaulting to the US.

      • @PeachMan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        TBH I would expect stronger consumer protections in the UK…but I definitely don’t know about this type of refund specifically.

        • @HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          The UK, for all its problems, does typically have some of the best consumer protections in the world. I can see Amazon being forced to overturn this if there’s enough uproar (which there might not be tbf, seeing as they gave extra credit as compo).

      • @NeverNudeNo13
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Many countries other than the US are comprised of a federation of states. And also those that aren’t are generally considered nation states or sovereign states, which are still definitively states. The United States of America do not have an exclusive right on statehood.

        Plus even though it may be implied that the original replier intended the context to mean the United States of America… it is a valid response with further implication that one should check their local jurisdiction’s laws if they were so inclined to do so.

    • @MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Wait a minute, the US doesn’t have a blanket consumer law federally?

      This sounds like a pain.

      Federally this is against Australian Consumer Law. Didn’t offer the service you paid for? Better believe that’s a refund.