• @nonearther@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    101 year ago

    It’s not about that actually, it’s discrimination.

    These people are still seeing ads, but not the ones which they need at their age

    • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Yeah, I understand that, which brings up the second baffling point that someone went to facebook to search for insurance providers in the first place.

      • @ink@r.nf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -161 year ago

        You’re baffled people went on one of the most used website in the world to search for something. bruh…

        • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          Yes, I am baffled that anyone, with Facebook’s reputation for ads, selling personal information, etc, would choose to search for insurance carriers there instead of any number of other options that aren’t that big a leap away from Facebook, bruh.

    • chiisana
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      As much as most don’t like Facebook, I honestly don’t see why Facebook is at fault here. They’ve got a platform where advertisers come on, say “I want to sell ads to people Ages X-Y , Gender A, in Geography I, J and K”, and they serve ads accordingly. What are they supposed to do? Tell the advertisers “No no no, you need to also pay for ads on these other demographics that you explicitly excluded”? The plaintiff should be suing advertisers, not Facebook, for intentionally not targeting them.