• @nonearther@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      It’s not about that actually, it’s discrimination.

      These people are still seeing ads, but not the ones which they need at their age

      • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Yeah, I understand that, which brings up the second baffling point that someone went to facebook to search for insurance providers in the first place.

        • @ink@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -161 year ago

          You’re baffled people went on one of the most used website in the world to search for something. bruh…

          • @mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            Yes, I am baffled that anyone, with Facebook’s reputation for ads, selling personal information, etc, would choose to search for insurance carriers there instead of any number of other options that aren’t that big a leap away from Facebook, bruh.

      • chiisana
        link
        fedilink
        101 year ago

        As much as most don’t like Facebook, I honestly don’t see why Facebook is at fault here. They’ve got a platform where advertisers come on, say “I want to sell ads to people Ages X-Y , Gender A, in Geography I, J and K”, and they serve ads accordingly. What are they supposed to do? Tell the advertisers “No no no, you need to also pay for ads on these other demographics that you explicitly excluded”? The plaintiff should be suing advertisers, not Facebook, for intentionally not targeting them.