• @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    -61 year ago

    Pay for search? There should be another approach… at this rate will be paying for every single thing we do on internet and navigating properly would require a bunch of money .

      • @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I understand and I agree. I tried it already and kagi is great. But I’m concerned about the amount of services we will need to pay in order to stay out of the eyes . I’m not sure if it’s the way.

        • Chetzemoka
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          We have to pay for the services we use somehow. I’d rather it be cash than the details of my entire life. But the money to operate those services has to come from somewhere

      • Cyclohexane
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is how we will likely end up paying for services AND STILL having our data sold. It’s just the nature of capitalism. Businesses have to grow, and in today’s world selling data is always the natural progression towards it.

        A parallel example is streaming services starting out as “tv but no ads and on demand!” or “just pay for the service and you won’t see ads!” but now we are paying and there’s still ads.

      • Helix 🧬
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Paying a monthly service fee to not have the company sell your data under the guise of “free” sounds quite reasonable.

        How do you know they don’t make you pay and still sell your data to get even more profit? Because no company who said they’re not evil was ever evil?

          • Helix 🧬
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is unnecessarily defeatist.

            Why defeatist? I didn’t say it doesn’t matter. I think that many, if not most, corporations are evil and you shouldn’t trust a single word they say unless you are able to independently verify it.

            how do you know there isn’t a Lemmy instance running right now that’s collecting data with the intent to sell?

            I don’t, but I also don’t put a lot of sellable information on Lemmy, I rather link to my own sites, where some of them have a CC-BY-SA license. I know that everything I put on the internet is basically free game for evil capitalists.

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are already paying everywhere with your attention and your time by watching ads, it’s just been normalized to the point of you not realizing it.

      And if you’re using an ad blocker, that’s effectively piracy.

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      It’s either this or ads or selling your data

      • Oh, there’s a third way. Like DuckDuckGo & Qwant for example. Just have sponsored ads unrelated to you, or ads related to the specific search only (Without detailing your actual search terms to the one buying the ads) and selected companies in such “store” articles results.

        • hh93
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I said it’s ads or selling data - it can be any combination of those 3 factors

        • @smellythief@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          User choice in the form of multiple tiers would be ideal. I might or might not pay to remove non-creepy ads depending on how they’re presented.

    • mayooooo
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Yeah, I want to pay some sort of tax so that I can afford all of this stuff. Patreon this, patreon that, pay email, pay for search, I’m not made out of money