• @Linssiili@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Have you tried it? At least for me, I often get better results compared to google. Also Kagi has a free trial of 100 searches.

      Granted I’m a developer, so my job is basically just searching for information, so getting better results is really valuable for me.

    • ram
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      Totally valid. For me the killer feature is being able to change the weights for various sites, making it so websites with content that’s not useful to me or I don’t like don’t appear[1], pinning websites that I consider best-of-class for their relevant searches[2], and prioritizing websites I do like, but aren’t always the best answer[3].

      They also have a “Lenses” feature that lets you make your own search lens (like I have one for Lemmy-only results), but I’ve not really had much use for those.


      1. e.g. apple.com, facebook, nypost, quora ↩︎

      2. e.g. wikipedia, the ffxiv wiki ↩︎

      3. e.g. opencritic, speedrun.com, cbc, w3schools, github ↩︎

      • @goji@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        The regex redirect feature is another massive pro. I hope they bring it into Orion as well.

        I already use Stop the Madness for this, and probably will continue to as it’s a more global solution, but having it built right into the search engine at least shows they’re taking real steps to hand control back to the user.

        • ram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Oh ya I use that as well, to turn Youtube results into Invidious, reddit into web.archive.org/save/, twitter into nitter, tiktok into proxitok, and AMP results into normal articles. It’s nice because, since I use kagi on my phone, it reaches where extensions don’t normally.

      • shastaxc
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        I’m pretty sure there are browser extensions that already do this for you on Google. You can do it manually on each search but that’s obviously cumbersome. But browser extensions are basically what you’re describing and still free

        • ram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          There’s literally not. For blocking, sure, but not changing the behaviours of your search algorithm.

    • @narwhal@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      There’s the 5$/month option available if you don’t search more than 300 times a month.

    • @ink@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -11 year ago

      It’s cheaper to just run SearXNG instance. People claiming any new search engine is better than established ones are hallucinating with their anecdotes.

      • Kayn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        How easy is it for an average Joe to set up their own SearXNG instance?

        • The Doctor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It appears a bit more difficult than setting up the original Searx. I’ve been poking around in the code for SearXNG lately because I’m planning on migrating to it but haven’t done any serious work with it yet.

  • I posted this further down the thread, but I’ll put it here so it’s more visible in case the discussion is interesting.

    According to this source, DuckDuckGo makes ~$0.0027 per search from ad revenue. Kagi @ $5/300 searches is ~$0.01667/search, or >6x higher than DDG’s ad revenue. So is the overall value proposition from Kagi >6x higher than DDG?

    Or to put it another way, for ~$5/month, I can get unlimited VPN through Mullvad, which if I’m not mistaken is quite a bit more resource intensive than search per added customer.

    So $5/month for 300 searches, or $10/month for unlimited is a tough pill to swallow, especially when I have no guarantees that they’re not also selling my data. If they were a nonprofit, I’d trust them a bit more and just chalk the higher cost up to limited scale, but AFAIK they’re private so they have little incentive to reduce prices as they get more popular.

    So I’m skeptical.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I’ve been paying $10 per month for 1000 searches for a few months now and had no plans on cancelling. This unlimited change makes it even better. Not being constantly frustrated by poor search results trying to sell you stuff or influence what you’re looking for is worth the money.

  • seeg
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    @narwhal Anyone recommending self-hosting searchx instead

    1. https://dalf.github.io/searxng/donate.html They also ask for donations to help improve code
    2. Cheapest server is at around $5/month.
    3. Maintenance, upgrades, DDOS protection and whatnot also costs money.
    4. You’re still only as good as Google results allow you to be.
    • @goo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Correct. Same dum dums complaining about the proce are there ones buying $12 lattes/day.

      • PLAVAT🧿S
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        For some, money is tight, and there are already so many subscriptions available for premium service. Many of those are solutions to combat forced enshitification. The Internet is too powerful of a tool to back us into paying for every little feature. So forgive me for being a dum dum and not giving in and enabling these services that aim to nickel and dime.

        • @goo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          No one is saying that you should pay for every little feature.

          This whole thread is about a service which, in my opinion, is worth that $10 (or $5 for the standard plan) when its results are way better than the alternatives and, as the business plan is clear, it doesn’t sell you to third-parties.

          And obviously, I don’t assume that the same people above who suggest self-hosting SearXNG are in remote third world countries, because economically the price is on par with it. (Yeah, yeah, “But muh $5/mo vps can do it!” You manage that and keep up with it and see how you like it just to save those nickels and dimes.)

          Search was never free. And we’re talking about just $10.

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Are you more content with instead giving your search history to a company whose business model isn’t as transparent?

  • loathsome dongeater
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    300 searches per month for 5 USD sounds a bit expensive. That’s about 10 searches per day. Sometimes I have had to try four or five variations of a search query to find what I am looking for on Google. Having to worry about exhausting a paid search quota sounds a little bit nerve-racking.

  • @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    -61 year ago

    Pay for search? There should be another approach… at this rate will be paying for every single thing we do on internet and navigating properly would require a bunch of money .

      • @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        I understand and I agree. I tried it already and kagi is great. But I’m concerned about the amount of services we will need to pay in order to stay out of the eyes . I’m not sure if it’s the way.

        • Chetzemoka
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          We have to pay for the services we use somehow. I’d rather it be cash than the details of my entire life. But the money to operate those services has to come from somewhere

      • Cyclohexane
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is how we will likely end up paying for services AND STILL having our data sold. It’s just the nature of capitalism. Businesses have to grow, and in today’s world selling data is always the natural progression towards it.

        A parallel example is streaming services starting out as “tv but no ads and on demand!” or “just pay for the service and you won’t see ads!” but now we are paying and there’s still ads.

      • Helix 🧬
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Paying a monthly service fee to not have the company sell your data under the guise of “free” sounds quite reasonable.

        How do you know they don’t make you pay and still sell your data to get even more profit? Because no company who said they’re not evil was ever evil?

          • Helix 🧬
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is unnecessarily defeatist.

            Why defeatist? I didn’t say it doesn’t matter. I think that many, if not most, corporations are evil and you shouldn’t trust a single word they say unless you are able to independently verify it.

            how do you know there isn’t a Lemmy instance running right now that’s collecting data with the intent to sell?

            I don’t, but I also don’t put a lot of sellable information on Lemmy, I rather link to my own sites, where some of them have a CC-BY-SA license. I know that everything I put on the internet is basically free game for evil capitalists.

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You are already paying everywhere with your attention and your time by watching ads, it’s just been normalized to the point of you not realizing it.

      And if you’re using an ad blocker, that’s effectively piracy.

    • hh93
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      It’s either this or ads or selling your data

      • Oh, there’s a third way. Like DuckDuckGo & Qwant for example. Just have sponsored ads unrelated to you, or ads related to the specific search only (Without detailing your actual search terms to the one buying the ads) and selected companies in such “store” articles results.

        • hh93
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I said it’s ads or selling data - it can be any combination of those 3 factors

        • @smellythief@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          User choice in the form of multiple tiers would be ideal. I might or might not pay to remove non-creepy ads depending on how they’re presented.

    • mayooooo
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Yeah, I want to pay some sort of tax so that I can afford all of this stuff. Patreon this, patreon that, pay email, pay for search, I’m not made out of money

  • @willya@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Who wants to celebrate by gifting me a year? Good news though as the prices were pretty ridiculous overall. I think I’ll stay on the $5 plan as I seem to be hitting ~170 searches a month ATM.