• Move to lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61 year ago

    There are three options here, leftist which is anarchist or communist, but the anarchists don’t vote so they’re functionally irrelevant. The other options are neoliberal or tory. There aren’t any others, pretending there are is absolute nonsense and your unwillingness to just speak straight instead of in riddles makes you sus from the outset.

    • @jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of room on the left between communism and neoliberalism. Have you heard of non-communist socialism (e.g. Titoist market socialism)?

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Claiming Tito was not a communist is getting kinda weird given the party was called the League of Communists of Yugoslavia

              • Move to lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                SWCC is borderline fascist.

                Why do you say that? The electoral structure is almost identical to Cuba, although significantly larger in scale (due to obvious population differences), both systems were derivative of the USSR’s system.

                What unique structural feature makes you call one fascist over the other? I at least assume you don’t consider Cuba fascist. And what exactly is your take on the USSR? You are aware that the electoral system of Yugoslavia under Tito was also extremely similar right? I mention this since you implied you were fond of titoism.

      • mycorrhiza they/them
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I think Salvador Allende tried that. The west couped him and installed a fascist dictator who threw leftists out of helicopters.