Outside the “snitch” headline, nowhere do I see that stated - or even implied. I hate right-wing spin as much as any sane person, but I also try to be fair. The article proper didn’t contain a single thing that screamed “bullshit” to me. Maybe the choice of Xitter user quote they inserted, but that’s all.
So Im just saying seems a bit unreasonable. M not talking about the veracity. I don’t have the background on the reporting site to say anything about it
Outside the “snitch” headline, nowhere do I see that stated - or even implied. I hate right-wing spin as much as any sane person, but I also try to be fair. The article proper didn’t contain a single thing that screamed “bullshit” to me. Maybe the choice of Xitter user quote they inserted, but that’s all.
The total ban on hiking and camping very unreasonable. And hard to enforce.
The ban on anything flame related totally justified, and most follow it
Agreed. I don’t know why you’re saying that in response to a conversation regarding the article’s veracity, however.
So Im just saying seems a bit unreasonable. M not talking about the veracity. I don’t have the background on the reporting site to say anything about it
deleted by creator