• Move to lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            91 year ago

            Ahh gotcha. I meant it though it wasn’t rhetorical, I will answer questions.

            • @feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, I’m fine with that definition, that’s a sane use of the term. Part of me thinks we’d be better off reserving “nazi” for those who openly align themselves with the historical group and just use the descriptor “ultranationalist” for modern instances of ultranationalism. Might reduce equivocation.

              • Move to lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                111 year ago

                I think the problem there is that a shit load of people are so uneducated that they don’t associate nationalism with the nazis, they only associate the holocaust as the bad thing they did and really don’t understand that ultranationalist ideology will lead to a repeat of what occurred over and over again. Thus it becomes much easier to just say nazi when referring to these ultranationalists even though it’s technically incorrect when the ultranationalism they support is actually polish, or american, or fucking italian, idk etc etc etc. They’re all have pretty much the same goals just in a different set of completely made up lines on a map.

      • Move to lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Antifa are not ultranationalists. The vast majority are anarchists and communists, which are internationalist ideologies. Literally the polar opposite.

      • @feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You could call them an authoritarian paramilitary group, but they’re not nazis. That doesn’t automatically make them good, it’s just that nazism is a specific political ideology.

        • mycorrhiza they/them
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Half of them are anarchists, calling them authoritarian is a grandpa’s facebook-tier understanding of the situation

          • @feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -41 year ago

            I’ve yet to meet an anarchist following anything like a coherent ideology in that respect. They all seem very eager to impose themselves on others. I suppose one guy took a more academic position, but still seemed to idolise violence. Maybe the authority is decentralised, but frequently wielded as explicit force. Not far from libertarianism in that regard. Doesn’t appeal.

              • @feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                Cluster munitions, for all I care. What’s that got to do with anything? I was explaining my use of the word authoritarian. I’d make them illegal, if I were in a position to do so. But my place in society is installing irrigation and water management systems, I have to focus on that.

                • mycorrhiza they/them
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  4
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  [reposting this comment, last one apparently never made it over to lemmy.world]

                  What’s that got to do with anything?

                  Stopping nazi rallies is the main thing antifa does. You seem to oppose them doing it.

                  I’d make them illegal, if I were in a position to do so

                  But you’re not. None of us are. So that leaves what other options?