compostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agoISO 8601slrpnk.netimagemessage-square245linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down134file-text
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1imageISO 8601slrpnk.netcompostgoblin@slrpnk.net to Comic Strips@lemmy.worldEnglish · 23 days agomessage-square245linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremissandry351linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down21·22 days agoNo! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
minus-squareMapleMan@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·22 days agoIf you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
minus-squaremodeler@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·22 days agoI know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
minus-squareWalk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·22 days agoSo true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh
No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense
If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.
I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.
What you said is stupid
So true, bestie! That’s why all the clocks in my house are formatted ss:mm:hh