• missandry351
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    No! It’s the other way around, from largest to smallest is a mess and it makes no sense

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      I know, right! I’ve been campaigning for this for everyday numbers. For example, twenty seven should be written smallest first: 72. Likewise this year is 5202, and next year 6202. That way no-one’s going to be confused at all.

    • MapleMan@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you name files or other data with ISO 8601 then they’re always sorted chronologically when you go largest to smallest.