@hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 day agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1871arrow-down128file-text
arrow-up1843arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zone@hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-21 day agomessage-square164fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@TheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink5•edit-21 day agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•23 hours agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.