@hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-210 hours agorulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1716arrow-down119file-text
arrow-up1697arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.blahaj.zone@hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone • edit-210 hours agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•11 hours agoThat’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
minus-square@TheDoozer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•edit-210 hours agoAnd I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
minus-square@Aqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•6 hours agoAnd would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.
That’s under the assumption that you’re actually getting them to a doctor and not just slapping the bandaid on and calling it a day.
And I would argue that in either case, stopping the bleeding is still the immediate goal.
And would be correct. But if we’re planning a health system, and I keep insisting on bandaids but refuse to even talk about anything else, my proposal is a bait-and-switch. That’s the problem, not UBI/NIT, as a concept.