• @M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 month ago

      Yeah, he should have thought about how he was dressed (in the blood of the insured) in that part of town.

    • @clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      The public pays for coverage and expects to be covered. If the insurers think the cost is too high then they should just increase premiums instead of denying coverage under existing contracts. Simple like that.

        • @clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 month ago

          On single payer, very complex procedures like organ transplants, tumor resections in complicated places (ie neurosurgery) become completely out of reach of normal people. That is also extreme and undesirable.

            • @clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              See, there is a qualitative difference there. Not being able to pay single payer for a procedure that is way too expensive is one thing. The other, is paying for insurance coverage and the insurer acting on bad faith to not deliver what the contract said it would.

              The latter is just fraud but in America the judiciary lets this happen as it is dysfunctional as well.