• @pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      113 hours ago

      there is no statement there so I don’t know what you mean by “incorrect”. all i see is someone who doesn’t know how people use tldr.

      • masterofn001
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Was it too long for you and you didn’t read it?

        In that case …This blog post is not for you.

        That’s what the question mark does. It marks a question.

        RTFA? RTFA!

      • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        213 hours ago

        Or someone who knows very well people use tldr to skip reading the post and you are annoyed that he caught you being that lazy.

        • @pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          012 hours ago

          valuing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.

          • @lightsblinken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            410 hours ago

            not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.

            • @pyre@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              08 hours ago

              this is what i mean by shit at writing.

              this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren’t worth their time… is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?

              I don’t think it’s actually getting any point across. it’s just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.