not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.
this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren’t worth their time… is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?
I don’t think it’s actually getting any point across. it’s just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.
valuing my time isn’t lazy. if you can’t summarize your post you’re probably shit at writing and the article is not worth the time in the first place.
not trying to be combative, but this grumpy response over a 5min read does illustrate something and i hope its trolling tbh. the tldr summary that is triggering here is kinda a key point of the article - people looking for a quick interaction and then moving on.
this is what i mean by shit at writing.
this fails to be the point of the article unless the article is suggesting people are moving on to quick interactions because they are deliberately being moved away from longer articles by the authors that suggest these articles aren’t worth their time… is the point of the article that longer content is belligerent and condescending?
I don’t think it’s actually getting any point across. it’s just a boomer who thinks no one has anything better to do.