• Pandantic [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    I love how this dude refuses to acually run against Kamala. It not a black man, it’s not Obama, you’re running against doofus, it’s a Black Woman. And, unless you’re a police officer, that’s at least 10x scarier for you.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -95 hours ago

      What’s to run against? It’s an election entirely on aesthetic. Do you want to old fat cat cigar smoking business dude or the lean mean latte sipping girl boss to rubber stamp our next genocide shipment to Israel and blame China for climate change?

      Maybe we get a SCOTUS judge to start issuing 5-4 rulings against fundamental democratic principles instead of a 6-3, if we’re lucky.

      • Pandantic [they/them]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 hours ago

        As much as I know Kamala is the status quo which is not my bag either for many reasons (genocide being one), I know things can be much worse. And, unless you’re an accelerationist (doubtful from a .world-er), isn’t it better to not give ultimate power over genocide or expulsion of immigrants to this supreme egomaniac?

        • @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          33 hours ago

          And shifting the balance of SCOTUS for the better compared to ending democracy to install an octogenarian fascist is practically the same thing. Both sides, amirite?

          You have a flawed candidate, and one of the worst in history, people - understand what’s on the line, and stop drawing false equivalencies.