• Track_Shovel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2517 hours ago

    Right? Like you can still enjoy their shit but not them personally. You can be a talented shit waffle

    • spinnetrouble
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1715 hours ago

      Yeah, that’s completely true. It’s up to each person to decide what their standards are and where they draw the line. Like Roman Polanski anally raping a 13 year old and using his money and fame to leave the country and avoid the prison time may be across one person’s line while another person says, “Eh, what can you do? It was almost 50 years ago.” Also true, but that piece of shit is still alive and making money–from people who like his work at least enough to keep consuming it.

      • Track_Shovel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1015 hours ago

        Yeah you’re on the ball. You got to draw lines somewhere. I’m not going to listen to a band whose bit is to run over baby rabbits with a lawn mower on stage. If you’re just a general fuck stick, though I’m more willing to accept that to a degree

      • @MBM
        link
        English
        37 hours ago

        That’s how you end up with a Hollywood full of sex pests

      • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1716 hours ago

        It’s a side effect of the commercialization of art.

        Artists that don’t offend anyone sell better and selling as much as possible has become all that matters to all the people who enable artists to continue making art and experience more tangible and real forms of artistic success

        Eventually everyone internalized it all so much that it’s a common misconception that every artist has a duty to be as commercial as possible and as such to be a role model. But only in ways that doesn’t offend anyone who’s in the target demographics.

        It sucks big floppy donkey dick, but that’s how the boring dystopia that is the real world works 😮‍💨