• @Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    115 days ago

    So many people spell it incorrectly that I’m starting to worry that “sike” will become the official spelling. Language evolves, but I don’t want it to.

    • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 days ago

      Or “would of”, “could of”, “should of”. Enunciate your words. “have” and “of” sound different.

      • @Molten_Moron
        link
        55 days ago

        Excellent point, but “would’ve”, “could’ve”, and “should’ve” sound like “would of”, “could of”, and “should of”.

        So the problem doesn’t lie solely in enounciation.

        • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          04 days ago

          If you think “of” and “have” (or it’s contraction) sound alike, you’re part of the problem. “Of” has a softer finish more like “ovf” than “ov”. The transition from ‘o’ to ‘f’ starts hard with a ‘v’ but finishes with a soft ‘f’.

    • @Zementid@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I never knew it hat a source,… I thought it was a word like “ouch” or “oops”

      Edit: English != mother tongue