• @Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      115 days ago

      So many people spell it incorrectly that I’m starting to worry that “sike” will become the official spelling. Language evolves, but I don’t want it to.

      • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        75 days ago

        Or “would of”, “could of”, “should of”. Enunciate your words. “have” and “of” sound different.

        • @Molten_Moron
          link
          55 days ago

          Excellent point, but “would’ve”, “could’ve”, and “should’ve” sound like “would of”, “could of”, and “should of”.

          So the problem doesn’t lie solely in enounciation.

          • @bitchkat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 days ago

            If you think “of” and “have” (or it’s contraction) sound alike, you’re part of the problem. “Of” has a softer finish more like “ovf” than “ov”. The transition from ‘o’ to ‘f’ starts hard with a ‘v’ but finishes with a soft ‘f’.

      • @Zementid@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I never knew it hat a source,… I thought it was a word like “ouch” or “oops”

        Edit: English != mother tongue