• @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -373 months ago

    Bullshit. Fascists have been around for millenia longer than our peaceful mindsets. Back then it was more useful to be but recent advances in technology has made their usefulness nothing more than a nostalgic yearning for past and passed glories

          • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            33 months ago

            One of Weber’s main intellectual concerns was in understanding the processes of rationalisation, secularisation, and disenchantment. He formulated a thesis arguing that such processes were associated with the rise of capitalism and modernity. Weber also argued that the Protestant work ethic influenced the creation of capitalism in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. It was the earliest part in his broader consideration of the world religions, as he later examined the religions of China, India, and ancient Judaism. Source

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              83 months ago

              Weber died in 1920. Fascism had literally only existed by name for a year before he died. He was not arguing about fascism, hence fascism never being mentioned on that Wikipedia page.

              • @girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                Fascism was an outgrowth of capitalism that’s barely a century old.

                This was what I was responding to, and the way it’s worded it seemed (to me at least) they were saying capitalism is barely a century old.

      • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -63 months ago

        Man has been around for thousands of years athis current sociointelligent level. It is not hard to extrapolate the current fascist mentalities back through the ages all the way through our barbarous past.

          • @Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -53 months ago

            Italy was not first. There was the mongols, the greeks, the spartans and probably many more that only rated a blurb in the history books

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              93 months ago

              You are conflating monarchy with fascism for some reason.

              The Mongols were governed by the Khan, who was an emperor.

              The Greeks had multiple kings of the various polises (aside from Athens for a while), until they were united under Alexander the Great, who was an emperor.

              The Spartans were Greek, so it’s weird you listed them separately.

              Fascism and monarchy are both authoritarian, but authoritarianism is not fascism.

    • @BallsandBayonets
      link
      English
      53 months ago

      I’m not entirely sure about millennia, but capitalism has been around for at least as long as currency has. That too has changed names but the idea of whoever is born with the most gets to steal the most is older than all existing civilizations.

      • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Eh, you’re both wrong. Fascism is an invention of the 20th century and capitalism is mostly an invention of the 19th century (although The Wealth of Nations was published in 1776). Both ideologies have very deep roots that you’re conflating with their dominant modern expressions. Capitalism is specific ideology built around market economics, but markets alone are not capitalism. Likewise fascism is a specific authoritarian ideology, but authoritarianism is not in itself fascism.

      • Victoria Antoinette
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13 months ago

        capitalism superceded mercantilism about 2 centuries ago. it’s nowhere near as old as currency

      • @volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        What you’re saying is at best debatable, and it’s definitely not consensus in academia. Feudalism is substantially and fundamentally different from capitalism. Serfs worked the land not based on free contracts for a wage selling their labour as a commodity, but rather legally bound to their lord’s land. Access to consumer goods wasn’t through purchase as commodities in a free market, but through self-production and barter/debt within small communities. Peasants worked the land with their own means of production and made their own tools with their own means of production, and generally people weren’t hired working other people’s means of production.

        Class struggle has existed for millennia, but capitalism is just the current predominant system of class struggle because through industrial development it overpowers preexisting systems that weren’t capitalist.