

I wonder if some of those chuds think those waymos might be conscious
Only Bayes Can Judge Me
I wonder if some of those chuds think those waymos might be conscious
There are so many angles to this but here’s how I’m gonna sneer:
what kind of semen retention scheme is this
Note to the Peanut gallery: this guy knows about paperclipmaxxing but not this more famous comic. Curious. lmfao
Incredible work as always, self
Dis you:
that being said… AI does literally help some people. for many things. google search was my favourite AI tool 25 years ago, but it’s definitely not right now.
lol
Lol, I’m a decision theorist because I had to decide whether I should take a shit or shave first today.
What’s your P(doodoo)
time to donate my money to a different wiki that only has the noblest of intentions, wikifeet (jk)
Children really shouldn’t be left with the impression that chatbots are some type of alternative person instead of ass-kissing google replacements that occasionally get some code right
I agree! I’m more thinking of the case where a kid might overhear what they think is a phone call when it’s actually someone being mean to Siri or whatever. I mean, there are more options than “be nice to digital entities” if we’re trying to teach children to be good humans, don’t get me wrong. I don’t give a shit about the non-feelings of the LLMs.
hey dawg if you want to be anti-capitalist that’s great, but please interrogate yourself on who exactly is developing LLMs and who is running their PR campaigns before you start simping for AI and pretending like a hallucination engine is a helpful tool in general and specifically to help people understand complex topics where precision and nuance are needed and definitely not fucking hallucinations. Please be serious and for real
Very off topic: The only plausible reason I’ve heard to be “nice” to LLMs/virtual assistants etc. is if you are being observed by a child or someone else impressionable. This is to model good behaviour if/when they ask someone a question or for help. But also you shouldn’t be using those things anyhoo.
decidely unsexy. gerard is finally beating the allegations
Making LLMs safe for mentally ill people is very difficult
Arguably, they can never be made “safe” for anyone, in the sense that presenting hallucinations as truth should be considered unsafe.
For you, the day Disney graced your independent research lab was the most important day of your life. But for Disney, it was Tuesday.
-M. Bison (the M stands for Mickey Mouse)
If you want to hang out, you’ve gotta take her out, tech brain
If you want to get down, down on the ground, tech brain
AGI, say goodbye, ROI, tech brain
-Eric “Slophand” Slopton
Got curious and wanted to see if I could beat the Atari 2600. Found an online emulator here.
“Easiest” difficulty appears to be 8, followed by 1, then increasing in difficulty up to 7. I can beat 8, and the controls and visuals are too painful for me to try anything more than this.
SRD suspects a Palantir psyop
So in FR, there’s a “rogue AI” that starts taking over cyberspace, and quickly gains control of the nuclear arsenals of some countries. This prompts some people to believe that the AI will bring about a humanity evolution event through doomsday, so they decide to go full Basilisk and begin infiltrating different organisations in order to help the AI take over the world.
Compare & contrast to LW doomers, who nominally want to prevent AI from going rogue or killing everyone, but are also nominally supposed to infiltrate various organisations to stop AI development, up to and including nuclear strikes on data centres (lol)
Anyway, best moment for me was when the MC fights an AI doomers and tells him he spends too much time on tje internet.
Just watched MI: Final Reckoning. Spoiler free comments: I didn’t know that this and the previous film featured an AI based plot. AI doomers feature in a funny way, seemingly inspired by LW doomers, tho definitely not.
That’s reasonable, and especially achievable if you don’t use chatbots or digital assistants!